SHAHSIDHAR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN.SECY.EDU.DEPTT.BASICLUCKNOW and ORS.
WRIA/1141/2016 · 2025-11-11
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183984 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183984 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 1141 of 2016 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioners to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. November 11, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Jay Narayan Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Prashant Arora (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Shahsidhar And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Edu.Deptt.Basiclucknow And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench