SALAHUDDIN and ANR. v. ANJUMAN ISLAHUL MUSLAMEEN LUCKNOW THRU. SECY. and ORS.
CLRE/89/2018 · 2025-12-02
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183981 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183981 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CIVIL REVISION No. - 89 of 2018 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J. Sri Shobhit Nigam, learned counsel for the revisionist submits that he does not wish to press the instant petition. Sri Najam Zafar and Mohd Shadab Khan, learned counsel for the respondents submits that they have no objection. In view of the statement so made by Sri Shobhit Nigam, learned counsel for the revisionist, the present revision is dismissed as not pressed. December 2, 2025 Asheesh Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Mohd. Shakeel, Shobhit Nigam Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Aftab Ahmad, Mohd Shadab Khan, Munnawar Sultan, Najam Zafar, Rafat Farooqui, Tassodiq Husain Khan (Jaspreet Singh,J.) Salahuddin And Anr. .....Revisionist(s) Anjuman Islahul Muslameen Lucknow Thru. Secy. And Ors. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHEESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ASHEESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench