AKHILESH RAWAT v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
BAIL/1344/2025 · 2025-11-11
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183980 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183980 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 1344 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Counter affidavit filed today is taken on record. None appears for the informant despite notice. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 3. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 276 of 2024, under sections 70(2), 127(2), 137(2), 352, 351(3) BNS and under Sections 5/6 POCSO Act, P.S. Nagram, District Lucknow. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that daughter of the informant aged about 13 years was enticed by the applicant. Subsequently in her statement the victim admitted that she knew the applicant since long and had gone with her on motorcycle where physical relation were also formed. The tentative age of the victim is around 13 years. There is no definite document with regard to exact age of the victim. 5. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 6. Considering the statement that the victim had gone out of her own free will and medical does not corroborate the allegations of use of force, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shesh Nath Singh, Archana Rawat, Rahul Kumar Kaushal, Vivek Kumar Divedi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Akhilesh Rawat .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
who is in jail since 8.12.2024 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 7. Let the applicant Akhilesh Rawat be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
November 11, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 1344 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench