HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11056 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioners are aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents in deciding the representation/application dated 16.10.2025 filed by the petitioners. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that raising their grievances the petitioners have filed the aforesaid representation/application before the respondent authority, however the same has not yet been decided. 4. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the respondent authority should be directed to pass a reasoned order upon the representation/application of the petitioners. 5. Accordingly, the District Magistrate / Respondent No. 2 is directed to pass a reasoned order upon the aforesaid representation/application of the petitioners in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from date after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners. 6. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. December 1, 2025 Lokesh Kumar Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vinod Kumar Tiwari, Nishant Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Hanuman Sharan And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Fo U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Revenur Deptt. Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LOKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench