SUDHIR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME U.P. LKO. AND ANOTHER
/10201/2025 · 2025-12-04
Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183966 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183966 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10201 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The present application has been filed for the following main relief(s):-
"WHEREFORE, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble court may graciously be pleased to set- aside the impugned Non Bailable Warrant dated 03.1.2024 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate Hardoi in case No. 3894/2017(State versus Jadunath and others) Crime No. 525/2016, U/S 147,148,3268 506 IPC, P.S. Kotwali Nagar, District Hardoi, and also against the summoning order dated 18.08.2017 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate Hardoi, and also set aside the charge sheet No. 50/2017 DATED 4.03.2017 contained as ANNEXURE NO. 1,2&3 to this petition." Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as also the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Inder Mohan Goswami and another vs. State of Uttranchal and others reported in (2007) 12 SCC 1, Sunil Tyagi vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and another reported in 2021 SCC OnLine Del 3597 and Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in (2022) 10 S.C.R. 351 : (2022) 10 SCC 51 and the statement of counsel for the applicant that the applicant would appear before the court concerned, it is provided that if the applicant appears before the court concerned within two weeks from today and move an appropriate application before the trial court including for recall of non-bailable warrant, the same shall be considered and decided by the trial court expeditiously strictly in accordance with law. For a period of two weeks, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant so far as the proceedings in issue are concerned. In case, the applicant does not appear in terms of this order, coercive action shall be taken against him. The present application is disposed of in above terms. December 4, 2025 Jyoti/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Seva Kant, Alok Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Sudhir And Another .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench