ANANT BAHADUR SINGH AND 29 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DAIRY DEVELOPMENT LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/12703/2025 · 2025-10-31
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183952 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183952 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12703 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Sandeep Sharma learned counsel for the respondent nos. 2 and 3 and Mr. Rajeev Singh Chauhan, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that though the retiral dues has been paid to the petitioners but the interest on the said dues has not been paid yet. He submitted that the liberty may be granted to the petitioners to raise their claim before respondent no.3 for payment of interest on the delayed payment and the respondent no.3 may be directed to consider and decide the same within stipulated period of time. Be that as it may, without entering into the merits of the case, the petitioners are given liberty to raise their claim before the respondent no.3 with respect to interest, if any, within 15 days and if such claim is raised, the respondent no.3 is directed to consider and decide the same within further period of sixty days. With the aforesaid observations, present petition is disposed of. October 31, 2025 Ram Murti Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Nirbhay Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Anant Bahadur Singh And 29 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Dairy Development Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench