Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18395 (KAR)

SRI V PRASANNA v. SMT ANJANA NARAYANAPPA

WP/51344/2017 · 2025-01-21

Lalitha Kanneganti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:2535 WP No. 51344 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 51344 OF 2017 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SRI. V. PRASANNA S/O SRI. N. VEERABHADRAIAH, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O NO.3, SITE NO.45, HARSHA LAYOUT, SUBBAYYANA PALYA, BENGALURU-560 033 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. M.V. HIREMATH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. ANJANA NARAYANAPPA, SINCE DECEASED BY HER LR SRI. P.N. RAMADASSE, S/O SRI. NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O NO.2, D'COSTA DE LAYOUT, COOKE TOWN, BENGALURU-560 034. Digitally signed by MEGHA MOHAN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:2535 WP No. 51344 of 2017 2. SRI. S. SUNDAR, S/O LATE SRI. SREENIVASALU NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/O NO.527, III CROSS, SUBBAYYANA PALYA, BANASAWADI MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU-560 033. 3. SRI. N. HARSHA S/O SRI. NARYANA RAO AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O NO.35, III CROSS, BCC LAYOUT VIJAYANAGAR, BENGALURU-560 040 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.R. VEDAVENKAMAMBA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2; V/O/D 26.09.2024, NOTICE TO R3 IS H/S) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 23.8.2017 PASSED BY THE XXII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU ON I.A.3/16 IN EXECUTION NO. 372/2009 AT ANNEXURE-R BY ISSUE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER WRIT OR DIRECTION AND ETC. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:2535 WP No. 51344 of 2017 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL ORDER It is submitted by the learned counsel that the main suit itself is posted for judgment on 31.01.2025. There is no interim order by this Court and the Court has proceeded with the matter. At this point of time, this Court is not inclined to decide the merits or otherwise of this writ petition. 2. In the light of the fact that the main suit is reserved for judgment, this Writ Petition is dismissed. 3. All IAs., in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE KA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 32 CT:SNN