SRI. K.M. NANJUNDAIAH v. THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES
WP/54644/2016 · 2025-06-09
Suraj Govindaraj
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18394 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18394 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19457 WP No. 54644 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 54644 OF 2016 (GM-ML/PB) BETWEEN:
1a)
SRI. K.M. NANJUNDAIAH SINCE DEAD BY LRS
SMT. CHANNABASAMMA D.G., W/O LATE K.M. NANJUNDAIAH, HINDU AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, RENUKA TRADERS, NEAR STAND, HULIYAR, CHIKKANAYAKANAHALLI TALUK- 572 218.
1b) K.N. MADHU S/O LATE K.M. NANJUNDAIAH, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, RENUKA TRADERS, NEAR BUS STAND, HULIYAR, CHIKKANAYANAHALLI TALUK - 572 218.
1(c) SMT. ROOPA K.N., W/O SIDDALINGASWAMY D/O LATE K.M. NANJUNDAIAH HINDU, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS CHIKKABIDARE CHIKKANAYANAKAHALLI TALUK - 572 218.
…PETITIONERS (BY SRI. KRISHNA SWAMY S .,ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19457 WP No. 54644 of 2016
AND:
1.
THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, (MONEY LENDING) MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA TUMKUR-572 101.
2.
THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER B.H.ROAD TIPTUR-572 101.
3. SRI.K.M.CHENNABASAPPA S/O MARULA SETTY HINDU, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, SREE RENUKA BANKERS NEAR BUS STAND HULIYAR-572 218 CHIKKANAYAKANAHALLI TUMKUR DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. M. SRINIVAS KUMAR., ADVOCATE FOR R1 & 2;
SRI. S.B. LAKSHMI & SHIVAKUMAR M., ADVOCATE FOR R3)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT RESPONDENT NO.1 AND 2 TO REFRAIN 3RD RESPONDENT FROM CONDUCTING ANY BUSINESS IN THE SCHEDULE PREMISES WITH THE LICENCE GRANTED BY THEM UNDER ANNEX-A AND B.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19457 WP No. 54644 of 2016
ORAL ORDER
1. The petitioners are before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:
"Direction to respondents 1 and 2 to refrain 3rd respondent from conducting any business in the schedule premises with the licence granted by them under Annexure -A and B".
2. Memo dated 05.06.2023 has been filed signed by the learned for the petitioners, which reads as under:
"The LR's of deceased appellant submit that they do not press the petition as the parties have compromise the matter. Wherefore, it is prayed that the Hon'ble Court be pleased to dismiss the petition as not pressed, in the interest of equity and justice."
3. Accepting the said memo and submission of the counsel for the petitioners, petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE
RU, List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4