Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18393 (MAD)

Rajagopal v. Sinouvassane

CMP/4667/2024 · 2025-03-05

T V Thamilselvi

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CMP No. 4667 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 05-03-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI CMP No. 4667 of 2024 in SA SR No. 140400 of 2022 Rajagopal and 2 others Appellant(s) Vs Sinouvassane and 4 others Respondent(s) PRAYER To condone the delay of 1103 days in filing the Second Appeal and thus render justice. For Appellant(s): Mr. R. Rajarajan For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Vadivel for RR 1, 3 to 5 R2 - Deceased ORDER This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 1103 days in filing the above Second Appeal against the judgment and https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP No. 4667 of 2024 decree dated 31.07.2019 passed in A.S.No.03 of 2012, on the file of Principal Sub Judge, Puducherry confirming the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.302 of 2006 dated 28.04.2011 on the file of Principal District Munsif, Puducherry. 2. Mr.R.Rajarajan, learned counsel for appellants submitted that the certified copy of judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.3 of 2012 was obtained by petitioner's counsel on 30.08.2019. Therefore, due to lack of communication, it was not informed to the petitioner. In the meanwhile, there was national wide lock down declared due to COVID-19 pandemic. Hence, they were not able to come to Chennai and to engage their counsel. Only during the first week of December 2022, they gave instructions to file the Second Appeal. However, there is a delay of 1103 days in filing the above second appeal arose, which is neither willful nor wanton. Therefore, he filed this petition to condone the delay in filing the above second appeal. 3. Mr.S.Vadivel, learned counsel for respondents 1 and 3 to 5 appeared and raised strong objections stating that reason for the delay was not properly assigned. Hence, he prayed to dismiss this petition. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances, and the reasons stated by the petitioners in the affidavit stating that due to Covid-19 pandemic and due to lack of communication, the Second Appeal was not filed within a stipulated time, which seems to be justifiable one and the fact that the suit was filed in the year of 2006 and all these years, the same is pending before the court as well as an opportunity was not given to him and also the fact that the 1 st petitioner, who https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP No. 4667 of 2024 is the 7 th defendant in the suit is proceeding with this Second Appeal, this court is inclined to allow this petition on condition that the petitioners shall pay the cost of Rs.4000/- payable to the learned counsel for respondents 1, 3 to 5 within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Registry is directed to number the Second Appeal if it is otherwise found to be in order and post the matter on 24.03.2025. 05-03-2025 rpp Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No N.B. : Issue order copy on 06.03.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP No. 4667 of 2024 T.V.THAMILSELVI J. rpp CMP No. 4667 of 2024 in SA SR No. 140400 of 2022 05-03-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis