1 / 3 2025:CGHC:18053 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2657 of 2025 1 - Smt. Laxmi Mishra W/o Shri Manishankar Mishra Aged About 51 Years Working As Supervisor, Under Department Of Women And Child Development, R/o Village - Shardha, Post - Sewar, Tahsil - Bilha, District - Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Through - The Secretary, Women And Child Development Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Director Women And Child Development Department, Directorate, Second Floor, Block-A, Indrawati Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, District - Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The District Program Officer (D.P.O.) Department Of Women And Child Development, District - Mungeli (C.G.) 4 - The Project Officer Integrated Child Development Services Project Pathariya, District- Mungeli (C.G.) 5 - The Collector Mahasamund, District - Mahasamund (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) SOURABH BHILWAR Digitally signed by SOURABH BHILWAR Date: 2025.04.23 10:52:36 +0530 2 / 3 For Petitioner : Mr. Sameer Behar, Advocate For Respondents/ State : Mr. Soumitra Kesharwani, Panel Lawyer (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU) Order on Board 22/04/2025 1. By the present petition, the petitioner who is working as Supervisor under the Department of Women and Child Development, is seeking a direction towards the respondent authorities/ Director, Women and Child Development Department and Project Officer, Integrated Child Development Services Project Pathariya to fix her pay since after her selection and appointment to the post of Supervisor on 30/08/2011. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has raised her grievance before the respondent No.2 by filing a representation (Annexure P/5) stating therein that proper pay has not been fixed since her appointment as Supervisor in the year 2011, however, till date, the representation of the petitioner is not being considered by the concerned authorities. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the State would submit that if the representation (Annexure P/5) submitted by the petitioner is still pending before the respondent authorities, the same shall be considered in accordance with law and necessary decision will be taken, within the stipulated time. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents. 3 / 3 5. From perusal of the representation of the petitioner, it appears that the petitioner is receiving less pay in lieu of her post i.e. Supervisor as her pay has not been fixed in accordance with law till date. 6. In view of the above and looking to the submission made by learned counsel for the State, the respondent authorities are directed to consider and decide the pending representation (Annexure P/5) submitted by the petitioner in accordance with law, within a period of 50 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 7. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of. 8. The petitioner is at liberty to apprise the concerned authorities with regard to the order passed by this Court. Sd/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU) JUDGE $. Bhilwar