HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10487 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J. 1. Sri Saumya Kant, Advocate has filed vakalatnama on behalf of the respondent No.5 in Court today, which is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State, Sri Ratnesh Chandra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent No.4 and Sri Amrendra Nath Tripathi, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Saumya Kant and Sri Navneet Yadav, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent No.5 3. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, wherein the writ petitioner has sought for the following substantial reliefs:- "(I) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties concerned to refrain from acquisition of land Gata No. 518 situated at Sarsawan, Tehsil- Sarojininagar, District Lucknow, in the interest of justice. (II) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari thereby to quash the Notification No. 33/Land Acquisition/Nagar Mahapalika-1/Lucknow dated 13.04.2023, the acquisition under section 19 and declaration no. 35/(Land Acquisition)/Nagar Mahapalika-1/ Lucknow dated 15.03.2024 also quash the notice Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Santosh Kumar Ramakant Upadhyay, Arvind Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ratnesh Chandra, Ravish Ji Nigam Dilip Kumar Dwivedi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Secy. Housing And Urban Planning Deptt. Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) under section 21(4) and (5) of this Act, 2013 regarding land Gata No. 518 dated 20.06.2024, in the interest of justice. (Contained in Annexure No. 1 to this writ petition)" 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents has submitted that the award has already been published and the petitioner is at liberty to challenge the said award in accordance with law. 5. We have considered the averments made in the writ petition and the annexures enclosed therewith and we are of the view that the petitioner should exercise his right of appeal as per the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 in accordance with law. 6. The writ petition is disposed of, accordingly. November 19, 2025 cks/- WRIC No. 10487 of 2025 2 (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA KANT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA KANT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench