Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 183919 (ALL)

RAMNARESH v. ADDL. COMMISSIONER JUDICIAL, AYODHYA DIVISION, AYODHYA AND 3 OTHERS

/6847/2025 · 2025-11-24

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6847 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents are hereby dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to respondent No. 1 to decide the Interim Relief Application pending in Revision No. 1918/2025, Computerized Case No. C-202504000001918 (Ramnaresh Vs. Ram Prsad and otehrs), U/S 210 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 expeditiously. 4. It is urged that though the matter is being listed but for one reason or the other, the aforesaid case is not being decided. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case respondent No. 1, considers and decides the aforesaid interim relief application in a time bound manner. 6. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 7. Accordingly, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and prayer made by learned counsel for petitioner, without entering into the merits, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no. 1 - Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhyato consider and decide Interim Relief Application pending in Revision No. 1918/2025, Computerized Case No. C-202504000001918 (Ramnaresh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajay Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh Ramnaresh .....Petitioner(s) Addl. Commissioner Judicial, Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Vs. Ram Prsad and otehrs), U/S 210 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 expeditiously, say, within a period of six weeks from the date, report regarding sufficiency of service is received with regard to the service on respondents and in case there is some legal impediment, it shall also be open for the petitioner to press for grant of ad interim relief in case the case is so made out. November 24, 2025 Ravi/Anurag A227 No. 6847 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench