HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 129 of 2016 Court No. - 19 HON'BLE RAM MANOHAR NARAYAN MISHRA, J. None appears for the appellant. Learned counsel for the respondent no. 3 is present. As per Office Report dated 03.02.2020, service of notice on respondent nos. 1 and 3 is sufficient but it is not sufficient on respondent no. 2, the owner of the vehicle. The matter was placed under Chapter XII Rule 4 of Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 vide order Office Report dated 25.02.2020. On 28.03.2023, an order was passed to the effect that "Since the appeal is of the year 2016, a week's time is granted to the appellant to take steps, failing which, the appeal shall stand dismissed without further recourse to the Court." On 15.04.2023, a further report has been filed by Office of the Registry that in compliance of the Hon'ble Court's order dated 28.03.2023, learned counsel for the appellant has failed to take steps to serve notice upon respondent no. 2 by R.P.A.D. Hence, the instant matter is put up under Chapter XII Rule 4 of Allahabad High Court Rules. As the appellant failed to take steps despite orders passed by Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Saket Kumar Gupta, Sanjay Kumar Nigam Counsel for Respondent(s) : Satyajit Banerji Smt. Ram Dulari .....Appellant(s) Nausad And Ors. .....Respondent(s) this Court and the instant matter has already been fixed under Chapter XII Rule 4 of Allahabad High Court Rules, consequently the appeal stands dismissed. November 3, 2025 Raj FAFO No. 129 of 2016 2 (Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench