Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 183893 (MAD)

A.SURESH v. THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU

WA(MD)/11/2021 · 2025-12-08

G R Swaminathan, R Kalaimathi

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.A.(MD)No.11 of 2021 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 08.12.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.KALAIMATHI W.A.(MD)No.11 of 2021 A.Suresh ... Appellant Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Department of Higher Education, Fort St.George, Chennai - 09. 2.The Teacher's Recruitment Board, Rep by its Secretary, EVK Sampath Maligai, DPI Compound, College Road, Chennai - 06. 3.The Director of Collegiate Education, O/o.of the Directorate of Collegiate Education, Nungampakkam, Chennai - 6. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Appeal filed under Clause XV of Letters Patent, to allow the writ appeal by setting aside the order passed in W.P.(MD).No.12978 of 2014 dated 03.11.2020 on the file of this Court. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.(MD)No.11 of 2021 For Appellant : Mr.S.Rajasekar For Respondents : Mr.T.Amjadkhan, Government Advocate. JUDGMENT (By G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.) Heard both sides. 2.The appellant was an aspirant for the post of Assistant Professor in the department of Commerce. The recruitment process pertained to the year 2008. Originally, there were 58 posts. In the year 2010, only 36 posts had been filled up out of 58. In the year 2012, 16 posts were filled up. That still left 7 posts vacant. The writ petitioner wanted the respondents to publish the list of candidates for the remaining vacancies. According to the appellant, if the reserve list had been operated, he would have definitely been appointed. It was for that reason, this writ petition came to be filed. This writ petition is rather in the nature of an RTI query. In any event, in view of sheer lapse of time and on account of the fact that the appellant filed another writ petition subsequently, we are 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.(MD)No.11 of 2021 of the view that interference with the impugned order is not called for and the writ appeal is dismissed. No costs. (G.R.S. J.,) & (R.K.M. J.,) 08.12.2025 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias To: 1.The Principal Secretary, Department of Higher Education, Fort St.George, Chennai - 09. 2.The Teacher's Recruitment Board, Rep by its Secretary, EVK Sampath Maligai, DPI Compound, College Road, Chennai - 06. 3.The Director of Collegiate Education, O/o.of the Directorate of Collegiate Education, Nungampakkam, Chennai - 6. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.(MD)No.11 of 2021 G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. and R.KALAIMATHI, J. ias W.A.(MD)No.11 of 2021 08.12.2025 (2/2) 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis