Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY ,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 14286 OF 2025 Between: Vara Nooka Raju, S/o. Kondayya, Aged 58 yrs, R/o. Chittempadu Village, Koyyuru Mandal, Alluru Seetharamaraju District. ...Petitioner AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Horite Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi Amaravati, Guntur District.
2. The District Collector, Anakapalli District, Anakapalli.
3. The Superintendent of Police, Anakapalli District, Anakapalli. V--" ■■
4. The Sub Division Police Officer, Narsipatnam, Anakapalli District.
5. The Station House Officer, Rolugunta Police Station, Rolugunta, Anakapalli District.
6. The Tahsildar, Rolugunta Mandal Rolugunta, Anakapalli District. ^
7. Kedari Rajababu, S/o. Angulu, Aged 42 yrs, R/o. Mokasa, Kothapatnam Village, Rolugunta Mandal, Anakapalli District.
8. Edela Rajeswari, W/o. Pothuraju, R/o. Mokasa, Kothapatnam Village, Rolugunta Mandal, Anakapalli District,
9. Neelapu Yerakanna, S/o. Danayya, R/o. Mokasa, Kothapatnam Village,
" Rolugunta Mandal, Anakapalli District. - ' ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate
order, writ or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of respondent authority in not taking appropriate action on the complaint of the petitioners against the unofficial respondents by providing police protection to protect the property of the petitioners by considering the report submitted by the 6*^ respondent dt. 18- 07-2024 and 28-02-2025 to protect the property of the petitioners of an extent of Ac. 9.83 cts in Sy. No. 139, 139/1 and 2 of Mokasa Kothapatnam Village ( MK Patnam ), Rolugunta Mandal of Anakapalli District free from the trespassers and the injunction orders in I.A. No. 800 / 2023 in O.S. No. 450 /2023 on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judges Court at Narsipatnam and not initiating bind over cases on the unofficial respondents as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and also the fundamental right guaranteed under Constitution of India, consequently directing the respondent officials to take appropriate action against the unofficial respondents and their by providing police protection to protect the said property of the petitioners and further initiating bind proceedings on the unofficial respondents and their men in protecting the said property free from the encroachment.' more men lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be
pleased to direct the respondents 2 to 6 to take appropriate action on the complaint of the petitioners to protect their lives and property of an extent of Ac. 9.83 cts in Sy. No. 139,139/1 & 2 of Mokasa Kothapatnam Village ( MK Patnam ). Rolugunta Mandal of Anakapalli District by considering the report of the 6th respondent Dt. 18-07-^2024 & 28-02^-2025 by providing police protection and also by taking binding over bond from the unofficial respondents. V- Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI T V S PRABHAKARA RAOy Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1, 3,4 & 5: GP FOR HOME \ ■ Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 & 6: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.
7,8,9: ~ The Court made the following:
APHC010254462025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY ,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 14286/2025 Between: Vara Nooka Raju ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1 - T V S PRABHAKARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR HOME 2.GP FOR REVENUE
2 The Court made the following Order: Heard
learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, appearing for the respondents 1 to 6. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is seeking police protection to protect the property whiph according to the petitioner is in his possession. The learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that there are civil diputes pending over it and that Mandal Executive Magistrate, Rolugunta Mandal, had issued lyiC proceedings vide MC.No.47 of 2025 dated
2.
3.
28.03.2025.
4. Considering the submission that MC proceedings are pending, this Court is not inclined to interfere in this matter and accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed.
5. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/- M.PRABHAKAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To SRI. TVS PRABHAKARA RAO, Advocate [OPUC]
1. One CC to
2. Two CCS to GP FOR HOME, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] GP FOR REVENUE, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]
3. Two CCs to
4. Three CD Copies sree
HIGH COURT DATED: 17/06/2025
ORDER WP.No.14286 of 2025 of andh^ 5 ?5JUL 2025 m ^ Current Section , if A DISMISSING THE W.P.