SMT. PHOOL MATI DEVI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. DEPTT. BAL VIKAS SEWA EVAM PUSHTHAHAR LKO. AND 6 OTHERS
WRIA/12637/2025 · 2025-10-29
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183845 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183845 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12637 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf opposite parties 1 to 6. In view of order being passed, notice to opposite party no.7 stands dispensed with.
2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed challenging the income certificate dated 01.01.2025 issued in favour of opposite party no.7, namely Smt. Vimla Devi, wife of Sri Sudhir Chaudhary. Further prayer for deciding petitioner's complaint dated 28.06.2025 and for consideration of her case for appointment as Anganwadi Worker in the Centre concerned has also been made.
3. Learned State Counsel has been provided written instructions dated 27.10.2025, a copy of which is taken on record and as per which petitioner's complaint has already been decided after enquiry and the income certificate was found to be genuine.
4. In view thereof, it shall be open to petitioner to challenge aforesaid order and the finding before the appellate authority. For the said purpose, petitioner shall be provided a copy of the decision taken on complaint of petitioner by authority concerned within a period of one week from the date a certified copy of this order is served upon said authority failing which the complaint preferred by petitioner shall be decided after affording opportunity of hearing to opposite party no.7 within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order by authority concerned.
5. The concomitant prayers made by petitioner in the present writ petition would be subject to final orders passed in Appeal to be Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pawan Kumar Misra, Alina Masoodi, Wali Nawaz Khan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Smt. Phool Mati Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Bal Vikas Sewa Evam Pushthahar Lko. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s)
preferred by petitioner.
6. With aforesaid direction, the petition stands finally disposed of. October 29, 2025 kvg/- WRIA No. 12637 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench