VISHVANATH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOMEE LKO
BAIL/11399/2025 · 2025-11-25
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183844 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183844 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11399 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.383 of 2025, under Sections 191(2), 103(1), 61(2) of BNS, Police Station Lalganj, District Raebareli.
3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that the son of the informant was married to the daughter of the applicant and there was a dispute between them. Subsequently, the entire matrimonial family had killed him. The cause of death as per the postmortem report is ante mortem throttling. The applicant is the father-in-law of the deceased. The age of the applicant is 75 years.
4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer.
5. Considering the age of the applicant and there being nothing against the applicant and the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 27.08.2025, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed .
6. Let the applicant Vishvanath be released on bail in the abovesaid first information report number on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the court Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Jaikaran Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A Vishvanath .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Homee Lko .....Opposite Party(s)
concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 25, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 11399 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench