Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 183842 (ALL)

SOHAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND OTHERS

CRLP/1277/2025 · 2025-11-06

Rajiv Gupta, Tej Pratap Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1277 of 2025 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE TEJ PRATAP TIWARI, J. 1. Despite mention being made by the petitioner, no one appears on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition. 2. Per contra, learned AGA has pointed out that in the instant case, investigation has already been concluded and charge-sheet has been submitted against the petitioner on 12.03.2025 and as such, this petition has been rendered infructuous. 3. In view of the submission made, since the charge-sheet has been submitted against the petitioner, this petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. November 6, 2025 NSC Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anadi Kumar Singh, Shailendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Tej Pratap Tiwari,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Sohan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NARENDRA SINGH CHAUDHARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench