HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8441 of 2018 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant(s), learned A.G.A. for the State-opposite party no.1 and Sri Ram Prakash Shukla, learned counsel appearing on behalf of opposite party no.2. 2. The present application has been filed seeking quashing of the entire proceedings of Criminal Complaint Case No.1124 of 2012 (new Case No.1923 of 2017, Indramani Vs. Rajesh Kumar Dubey and others, under Sections 323, 504, 506, 452 and 427 IPC and the orders dated 04.04.2018 and 14.04.2014 passed by the Civil Judge (JD)/Judicial Magistrate, Court No.22, Sultanpur. 3. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record. 4. Learned counsel for both the parties submit that parties have amicably settled their dispute outside the Court by way of compromise and the original compromise deed dated 27.11.2025 has been annexed as Annexure-SA-1 to the supplementary affidavit, therefore, the aforesaid case may be decided in terms of the compromise arrived at between the parties. 5. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the trial court, as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties before the court concerned. 6. Accordingly, the present application is disposed of with a direction to Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Surendra Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Govt. Advocate Rajesh Kumar Dubey .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) both the parties to appear before the court concerned on 10.12.2025 and file their comprise application. If such compromise application is filed, the court concerned shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise within six weeks from that date. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court making compromise to be part of the record and a report to that effect shall also be send to this Court whether the said compromise took place or not. The court concerned will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise. It will also be open to the applicant to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 7. For a period of three months, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid complaint case. 8. Office is directed to return the original compromise deed to the counsel for the applicant(s) after retaining a photocopy of the same on record. November 28, 2025 Rao/- A482 No. 8441 of 2018 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench