Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18383 (AP)

MELIMI ANUSHA RANI v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/12852/2025 · 2025-08-20

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010255002025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 12852/2025 Between: 1. MELIMI ANUSHA RANI, W/O.GUNAM ANIL KUMAR, AGED 35 YEARS, R/O.KROSURU VILLAGE, KROSURU MANDAL PALNADU DISTRICT, A.P - 52241 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT OFFICE, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NAGARAPALEM, NAGARAPALEM, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 6. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NAGAMPALEM POLICE STATION, NAGARAPALEM, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents 2 to 4 to take immediate action against the respondent No. 6 the erring police officials of 5th respondent P.S. and proceed against them departmentally as per rules expeditiously and consequently direct the respondents to conduct free and fair investigation in the present matter and also this Hon'ble court may secure the CCTV footage which was recorded on 25.04.2025 from 7.00 am to 26.04.2025 till mid night, recorded in the 5th respondent police station has to be submit in a sealed cover before this Hon'ble court to secure the ends of justice and 2 directing the respondent No.2 to 4 to conduct fair investigation with respect to the events that transpired on the fateful day of 25.04.2025 to 26.04.2025 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VAJJA CHETHAN KUMAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: When the Writ Petition is taken up, learned counsel for the Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the Writ Petition. Permission is accorded. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 12852 of 2025 21.08.2025 Mjl /*