1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 359 of 2025 1 - Parmanand S/o Late Ramdayal Aged About 73 Years R/o Village Bilaigarh (Pathan), Tahsil - Dabhra, District - Sakti Chhattisgarh (Defendant No. 1) 2 - Manoj S/o Late Ramdayal Aged About 43 Years R/o Village Bilaigarh (Pathan), Tahsil - Dabhra, District - Sakti Chhattisgarh (Defendant No. 2) 3 - Rajkumar S/o Late Ramdayal Aged About 39 Years R/o Village Bilaigarh (Pathan), Tahsil - Dabhra, District - Sakti Chhattisgarh (Defendant No. 3) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Kushal Chand S/o Late Ramdayal Aged About 79 Years R/o Village Bilaigarh (Pathan), Tahsil - Dabhra, District - Sakti Chhattisgarh 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector Sakti District Sakti Chhattisgarh (Defendant No. 4) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. F. S. Khare, Advocate For Respondent No. 1. : Mr. Shashwat Mishra, Advocate For State/Respondent No. 2 Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Agrawal, PL Hon’ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput Order on Board 06/10/2025 After arguing for learned counsel for the petitioner submits that inadvertently in the appellate Court judgment, the fathers name of 2 petitioner Nos. 2 & 3 has wrongly been mentioned as Ramdayal whereas their father his Parmanand – petitioner No. 1. He further submits that this petition may be disposed of directing the learned trial Court to expedite the trial. 2. Not opposed by the other parties. 3. In view of above, this writ petition is disposed of and it is expected that the trial Court shall expedite the trial and conclude the same within a reasonable period of time. Sd/- (Sachin Singh Rajput) JUDGE Pawan