IBRAR GHOSHI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
BAIL/10456/2025 · 2025-10-29
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183815 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183815 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10456 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. 1.Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State and perused the record. Notice to the complainant is served, however, none responds for him. 2.It is alleged in the prosecution case that minor daughter of the informant aged about 17 years has been enticed away by the applicant. It is further alleged that while going away, she has taken Rs.1 lac cash as well as jewellery of gold and silver. 3.Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the victim in her statements under section 183 BNSS has not supported the prosecution case. While giving statement before the trial court also, she has been declared hostile. The applicant has no previous criminal history. The applicant is in jail since 29.5.2025. It is further submitted that there is no possibility of the applicant of fleeing away after being released on bail or tampering with the witnesses. In case the applicant is enlarged on bail, he shall not misuse the liberty of bail. 4.Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts as argued by the learned counsel for the applicant. 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the fact that the applicant has no criminal history, statement of the victim under section Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dharmendra Kumar Trivedi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ibrar Ghoshi .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
183 BNSS as also before the Court, it appears that the victim is a consenting party, arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, the period for which the applicant is in jail and without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, I find it to be a fit case for enlarging the applicant on bail.
6.Let the applicant Ibrar Ghoshi, involved in Case Crime No.228 of 2025 under sections 137(2), 87 BNS, 7/8 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, P.S. Kotwali Nagar, district Raebareli be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions which are being imposed in the interest of justice:- (i) The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial. (ii) The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness. (iii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (iv) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (v) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A I.P.C. (now 269 BNS) (vi) In case the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. (now 84 BNSS) is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A I.P.C. (now 209 BNS). BAIL No. 10456 of 2025 2
7.The application is allowed accordingly.
It is clarified that the observations made in this order are confined to the present bail application and shall have no bearing on the merit of the trial. October 29, 2025 kkb/ BAIL No. 10456 of 2025 3 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KUMAR BARANWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench