MAHRANIDIN v. SHRI SHAILENDRA KUMAR VERMA SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE DISTT. PRATAPGARH
/3296/2025 · 2025-12-15
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183814 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183814 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3296 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J. Learned Standing Counsel on the basis of instructions received from the respondent has submitted that the judgment and order passed by the writ Court has been complied with and the copy of the documents in support of the submission has been provided during course of the day, which is taken on record i.e. the photographs of the removal of the interlocking tiles from Gata No. 458 and its minzumla Gata including the copy of the notice issued against the Pradhan. Learned counsel for the applicant has very fairly submitted that the judgment and order passed by the Writ Court has been complied with and for all practical purposes, the present contempt petition has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as infructuous. In view of above, the present contempt application is dismissed as infructuous. Notice, if any, stands discharged. December 15, 2025 Nitesh Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Lalji Yadav, Vishnu Prakash Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :
(Manish Kumar,J.) Mahranidin .....Applicant(s) Shri Shailendra Kumar Verma Sub Divisional Magistrate Distt. Pratapgarh .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- NITESH KUMAR TEWARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench