Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18381 (GAU)

M/S MEDHI BROTHERS v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND 8 ORS

WP(C)/5044/2023 · 2025-02-23

Lanusungkum Jamir

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010192672023 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5044/2023 M/S MEDHI BROTHERS REPRESENTED BY THE SOLE PROPRIETOR SHRI HIRANYA MEDHI, HAVING ITS OFFICE CUM R/A HENGERABARI, LICHUBAGAN, BYE LANE NO. 2, HOUSE NO. 47, GUWAHATI-781036 VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 8 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION, NEW DELHI 2:THE INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY GUWAHATI REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR GUWAHATI-39 3:THE DIRECTOR INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY GUWAHATI ASSAM 4:THE REGISTRAR INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY GUWAHATI ASSAM 5:THE JOINT REGISTRAR (S AND P) Page No.# 2/3 INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY GUWAHATI ASSAM 6:THE PURCHASE COMMITTEE INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY GUWAHATI FOR CONDUCTION EVALUATION OF THE TENDER BIDS (TECHNICAL AND FINANCIAL) FOR THE TENDER DATED 17.02.2023 FOR SUPPLY AND INSTALLATION OF LED SMART TV. REPRESENTED BY THE DIRECTOR INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY GUWAHATI 7:M/S MAGNA SOLUTION OFFICE AT KAILASH NAGAR HATIGAON BELTOLA SANJOGI PATH OPP-SHIV MANDIR H-NO-45 GUWAHATI-781038 8:M/S DIGITEK SOLUTION OFFICE AT CHANDI BHAWAN 1ST FLOOR H-NO-24 A.K. AZAD ROAD REHABARI GUWAHATI-781008 9:HUE SERVICE PVT. LTD. OFFICE AT H.NO.-60 2ND FLOOR BESIDE BLUE MOON HOTEL BHUBAN ROAD UZAN BAZAR GUWAHATI-78100 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR S P DAS, MR A ALAM,MS C BORA Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., MS. B G BORBORUAH (r-8),MR A B DEY (r-2 to 6),MR. Page No.# 3/3 S SUTRADHAR (r-2 to 6),MR. R P KAKOTI SR. ADV. (r-2 to 6),SC, IIT BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE LANUSUNGKUM JAMIR ORDER Date : 24.02.2025 Mr. A. Deka, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. S. P. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that they have instructions to withdraw the present writ petition. Mr. A. B. Dey, learned counsel appears for the respondent Nos. 2 to 6. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed on withdrawal. Interim order passed earlier stands vacated. JUDGE Comparing Assistant