Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18381 (CHH)

SHAILENDRA SAHU v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRR/429/2021 · 2025-06-17

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:25997 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 429 of 2021 1 - Shailendra Sahu S/o Heeralal Sahu Aged About 29 Years R/o Gram Arjuni, Police Station Dongargaon, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Ghanshyam Sahu S/o Heeralal Sahu Aged About 32 Years ( Wrongly Mentioned Age In Order ) R/o Gram Arjuni, Police Station Dongargaon, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Heeralal Sahu S/o Kolhram Sahu Aged About 55 Years R/o Gram Arjuni, Police Station Dongargaon, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Hembati Sahu W/o Heeralal Sahu Aged About 53 Years ( Age Wrongly Mentioned In Order) R/o Gram Arjuni, Police Station Dongargaon, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. ... Applicants versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station Dongargaon, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent For Applicants : Mr. Prateek Singh Thakur, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Hariom Rai, Panel Lawyer 2 Hon’ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 18/06/2025 1. Heard Mr. Prateek Singh Thakur, learned counsel appearing for the applicants. Also heard Mr. Hariom Rai, learned Panel Lawyer appearing for the State. 2. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers: “(a) That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records pertaining to Sessions Case No. 34/2021 pending before learned Upper Sessions Judge (Fast Track), District- Rajnandgaon (C.G.). (b) That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash/set aside the impugned orders dated 08/03/2021(Annexure P/1 & 10.03.2021(Annexure-P/2) which is respectively passed and framed by learned Upper Sessions Judge (Fast Track), District Rajnandgaon (C.G.). (c) That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to pass any other order, direction or grant any other relief which the Hon’ble Court deems fit in the facts and circumstances of the case.” 3. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the case is fixed for final argument on 23.06.2025 before the trial Court. 3 4. It transpired from the status report that the case is fixed for final argument on 23.06.2025 before the trial Court. 5. There appears to be no interim order passed in the present revision. 6. Considering the submission made by learned counsel for the applicants as well as from perusal of the status report, I am not inclined to interfere with the matter at this stage, as the trial is in advance stage. 7. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed on this ground alone. 8. The trial Court is at liberty to proceed with the trial and to conclude the same expeditiously, if the same has already not been concluded. 9. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. 10. Registrar(Judicial) is directed to communicate this order to the concerned trial Court for necessary information and compliance forthwith. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice amita AMITA DUBEY Digitally signed by AMITA DUBEY Date: 2025.06.21 16:03:13 +0530