IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 13731 OF 2025 Between: K. Sathyanarayana, S/o. K. Sankaranarayana, Aged about 40 years, Occ: Cultivation, R/o. Basampalli Village, Chennekothapalli Mandal, Sri Sathya Sai District. ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. The Director General of Police, Andhra Pradesh, AP Head Quarters, Mangalagiri, Guntur District. 3. The Superintendent of Police, Puttaparthi, Sri Sathya Sai District. 4. The Station House Officer, Chennekothapalli Police Station, Sri Sathya Sai District. 5. Sake Haribhusana, S/o. Pothanna @ Potanna, Aged not known, R/o. D.No.28-4-612-3, Drivers Colony, 0pp. Old ACB Office, Ananthapuram City and District. 6. Kotia Mallikarjuna, S/o. Naganna, Aged about 40 years, R/o. Basampalli Village, C.K.Palli Mandal, Sri Sathya Sal District. 7. Kotia Yerriswamy, S/o. thippanna. Aged 45 years, R/o. Basampalli Village, C.K.Palli Mandal, Sri Sathya Sai District. 8. Kotia Ramakrishna, S/o. Mekala Narayana, Aged 50 years, R/o. Basampalli Village, C.K.Palli Mandal, Sri Sathya Sal District. 9. Kotia Venkatramudu, S/o. K Narasimhulu, Aged 45 years, R/o. Basampalli Village, C.K.Palli Mandal Sri Sathya Sai District. lO.KotIa Narasimhulu, S/o. Ramanjineyulu, Aged not known R/o Basampalli Village, C.K.Palli Mandal. Sri Sathya Sal District ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue any appropriate Writ, order or Direction preferably a Writ in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the RespondentNo.4 in calling the Petitioner to the Police Station and interfering in the civil disputes and threatening the Petitioner with false cases despite the interim orders passed in I.A.No.1 of 2025 in W.P.No.9227 of 2025 as illegal, arbitrary, high-handed, violative of principles of natural justice and violative of fundamental and constitutional rights guaranteed to the Petitioners under Article 14,19, 21 and 300A of Constitution of India and consequently to direct Respondents No.2 and 3 to take appropriate action against the Respondent No.4 for illegally entertaining false complaints and interfering in civil disputes by colluding with Respondents No.5 to 10 despite the interim orders passed in I.A.No.1 of 2025 in W.P.No. 9227 of 2025. may lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct Respondents No.2 to 4 to not interfere with civil disputes and agricultural operations of the Petitioners in land admeasuring Ac.1.39 cents in Sy.No.17.1B1 of Basampalli H/o. Kanumukkala Village, ChennekothapalliMandal, Sri Sathya Sai District. lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct Respondents No.2 and 3 to take appropriate action against false complaints and Respondent No.4 for illegally entertaining civil disputes by colluding with Respondents No.5 to 10. the interfering in Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI ARUN SHOWRI G Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4 : GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos.5 to 10 : NONE APPEARED The Court made the following: ORDER APHC010255052025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] r MONDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 13731/2025 Between: ...PETITIONER K Sathyanarayana AND ...RESPONDENT(S) The State Of Ap and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.ARUNSHOWR1 G Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 2 ORDERiz and the learned Assistant learned counsel for the petitioner Heard the Government Pleader for Home, learned counsel for the petitioner Nos.5 to 10, the 4' at the behest of in the civil disputes between them. It is submitted that this Court, in W.P.No,9227 of airected the parties therein to maintain status ,uo. in sp.te of the submits that, 2. The respondent is interfering m respondent pending 2025, has said direction, the 4' It is also submitted that in the civil disputes. respondent is interfering m as on the date of passing of the status quo 3. agricultural was in possession and was carrying on order, the petitioner in W.P.No.9227 of and the same will be dealt with by this Court in activities. 2025. direction to the 4 between the there shall be a civil dispute pending without following the due process 4. Considering the submissions interfere with the and respondent Nos.5 to 10 respondent not to petitioner of law. is disposed off. No costs. 5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition IS As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending. if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- M SRINIVAS assistant registrar //true copy// SECTION OFFICER To Pradesh, 2 The Director General of Police 7. Three C.D. Copies. r.nr HIGH COURT DATED; 16/06/2025 ORDER 2 3 JUN 20ft SectiQB>/+7 WP.No.13731 of 2025 CO DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS