Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 183803 (ALL)

JAISRAM AND 4 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER

/3840/2025 · 2025-11-27

Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 3840 of 2025 Court No. - 27 HON'BLE RAM MANOHAR NARAYAN MISHRA, J. 1. Heard Shri Mahesh Chandra Shukla, learned counsel for the applicants, Shri Avishesh Kumar Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. Instant appeal under Section 14-A(1) of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974) Scheduled Cast and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 has been preferred against the chargesheet no.01, dated 23.07.2020 as well as summoning order dated 15.10.2020 passed by Special Judge, S.C./S.T. Act, Lucknow in S.T. No.1383/2020, State versus Bajrang and others in Case Crime No. 227/2020, u/s 147,148.149,452,323 504,506,427,325, I.P.C. and Section 3(1) Da, Dha of S.C./S.T. Act relating to police station Indira Nagar, Lucknow. 3. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that at this stage, the prayer of the appellants is confined to the extent that the appellants seek to appear before the court below for prayer of bail. The offences are punishable with a maximum term of 7 years of imprisonment, therefore, a necessary direction may kindly be issued to the court below to consider the bail application of the appellants in terms of guidelines issued by Hon'ble Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022) 10 SCC 51. 4. Learned AGA has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the appellants. 5. In view of above prayer, the appeal is finally disposed off. The appellants are directed to appear before the court below within six weeks from today and move an application for bail which shall be heard and disposed of in terms of guidelines issued by Hon'ble Supreme in Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Mahesh Chandra Shukla, Mohd. Kashif Rafi Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Jaisram And 4 Others .....Appellant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s) Satender Kumar Antil (Supra). 6. For a period of six weeks from today, no coercive process shall be adopted against the appellants by the court below. November 27, 2025 KR CRLA No. 3840 of 2025 2 (Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra,J.) Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench