Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 183800 (ALL)

ABDUL GHAFFAR FAROOQI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. BASIC EDU. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

/10365/2025 · 2025-11-20

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10365 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the prayer clause(I). Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection. The prayer is allowed. The counsel for the petitioner is permitted to struck off the prayer clause(I), during course of the day. The prayer clause (II) and (III) are repositioned as prayer clause (I) and (II) in the writ petition. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Ran Vijay Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no. 2, Mr. Pradeep Tiwari, learned counsel for respondent nos. 4 & 5, Mr. Rajiv Singh Chauhan, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State and perused the records. Instant petition has been filed with the following reliefs:- "I- Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, commanding the opposite parties to reconsider the case of the petitioner for Inter District Transfer on the basis of his option form of the petitioner dated 26-06-2025 on the basis of the letter/order of the opposite party no.2 dated 13-06-2025, 16-06-2025, 26-06-2025 and 22-07-2025 which are contained as ANNEXURE NO. 2, 3, 6 AND 9 of the Writ Petition. (II)-Any other writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court deem fit in the circumstances of the case may also be passed in favour of the petitioner." Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ramesh Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pradeep Tiwari, Ran Vijay Singh Abdul Ghaffar Farooqi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Basic Edu. Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) After arguing at length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to give liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation before the respondent no. 2 and he may be directed to consider & decide the same, within stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Court. Learned counsel for the opposite parties have no objection to the contention aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into the merit of the case, the petitioner is permitted to move a fresh representation within period of 15 days, and if such representation is moved within aforesaid period, the respondent no. 2/Secretary, Basic Shiksha Parishad, Prayagraj, is hereby directed to consider and decide the same, within a period of six weeks, in accordance with law, from the date, a certified copy of this order is produced before him. With the aforesaid observations, the instant petition is disposed of. November 20, 2025 Mayank WRIA No. 10365 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench