Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18380 (AP)

N.Siva Reddy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/16803/2020 · 2025-09-09

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010255282020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 16803/2020 Between: 1. N.SIVA REDDY,, S/O N.PEDDI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O PULETIPALLI VILLAGE, C.K.PALLI MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT 2. R.GOVIND REDDY,, S/O NARAYANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O KOTHAKOTA VILLAGE, DHARMAVARAM MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT 3. R. KRISHNA REDDY,, S/O NARAYANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O KOTHAKOTA VILLAGE, DHARMAVARAM MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT 4. R.KARUNAKAR REDDY,, S/O NARAYANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O KOTHAKOTA VILLAGE, DHARMAVARAM MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, A.P., 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT., 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PENUKONDA DIVISION, PENUKONDA, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, C.K.PALLI POLICE STATION, C.K.PALLI, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. P NARAHARI BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 2 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent interfering in civil disputes and directing the petitioners not to enter in to land in Sy.No.257 to an extent of Ac.26.02 cents out of Ac.33.02 cents situated in Puletipalli Village, CK Palli Mandal, Anantapur District for their agricultural operation in their land without following any procedure under law and without any authority as illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and violative of Article 21, 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India.” 2. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, would submit that the Police are not interfering with the civil disputes between the parties. 3. Sri P.Narahari Babu, learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the Police not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:10.09.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.16803 of 2020 Dt.10.09.2025 Dinesh