Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 183796 (ALL)

SMT. SANDHYA SRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU SECY.OF MADHYAMIK EDU.CIVIL SECTT.and ANR.

WRIA/7939/2016 · 2025-11-19

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 7939 of 2016 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Mr. Ayush Mishra, advocate, holding brief of Mr. Pt.S. Chandra, counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructous. In view of the aforesaid statement given by counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is hereby dismissed as having become infructuous. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. Consigned to the records. November 19, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pt. S. Chandra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., G.C. Verma (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Smt. Sandhya Srivastava .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Secy.Of Madhyamik Edu.Civil Sectt.And Anr. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench