RAJU AND 6 ORS. v. STATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN.SECY.NAGAR VIKASH UP LUCKNOW and ORS.
WRIA/20386/2016 · 2025-12-09
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183783 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183783 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 20386 of 2016 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioners to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. December 9, 2025 AKS Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arvind Kumar Vishwakarma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., K.K.Pandey, Shailendra Singh Chauhan (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Raju And 6 Ors. .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Nagar Vikash Up Lucknow And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench