Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18376 (JHR)

ANKIT KUMAR ALIAS ANKIT BACHA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./5958/2025 · 2025-08-29

Ambuj Nath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. ( 2025:JHHC:26072 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 5958 of 2025 Ankit Kumar @ Ankit Bacha, aged about 22 years, S/o Bablu Prasad, R/o- Gurudwara Road, Mango, Near Shiv Mandir, P.O. & P.S.- Mango, Jamshedpur, District- East Singhbhum, Jharkhand --- --- Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand --- --- Opp. Party --- CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ambuj Nath --- For the Petitioner: Mr. Anurag Kashyap, Advocate For the O.P-State: Mr. Pankaj Kr. Mishra, A.P.P. --- 03 / 29.08.2025 Heard the parties. 2. Petitioner has been made accused in connection with S.T. Case No. 241 of 2024 arising out of Mango P.S. Case No. 33 of 2024 corresponding to G.R. No. 494 of 2024 for the offences registered under sections 302, 120-B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of Arms Act, pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Jamshedpur. 3. Bail application of the petitioner was earlier rejected by this court vide B.A. No. 10208 of 2024 by order dated 07.12.2024. 4. On 02.02.2024 at about 03:30 P.M., son of the informant Raja Kumar was shot dead. There is specific allegation against the petitioner and the co- accused persons that they have shot the deceased. It appears that the deceased had sustained multiple firearm injuries. 5. It was submitted that similarly situated co-accused persons have been granted bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this court. It was further submitted that some witnesses have been examined in this case and they have not identified the petitioner in the dock. 6. Considering the nature of allegation, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail stands rejected. Learned Trial Court shall expedite the trial (Ambuj Nath, J) Ranjeet/ Uploaded