Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18375 (AP)

S KALYANI v. P CHANDRA MOHAN

CRLP/3959/2020 · 2025-07-16

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHCO10254292020 EHife IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATl THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION N 3959 OF 2020 Between'. 1. S.Kalyani, W/o.S.Chandrasekhar Jetty, aged about 45 years,I occ:Housewife, R/o.No.3-874, Jattipalem, Mandivari Street, Srikalahasti Town and Mandal, G.S.T.Centre, Chittoor District. 2. Singanamallu Chandrasekhar Jetty, S/o.S.Narasaiah, aged about 50 years, R/o.No.3-874, Jatt'lpalem, Mandivari Street, Srikalahasti Town and MandaI, G.S.T.Centre, Chittoor District. .HPetitioners/Accused No.1 & 2 AND 1. P.Chandra Mohan, S/o.Late P.Raghavaiah, aged 46 years, R/a.No. 8/135, Bangaramma Colony, Srikalahasti Town, Tirupati Urban, Chittoor District. 2. The State ofAndhra Pradesh, Through SHO, Thottambedu P.S., Rep. by its public prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi, Guntur Distr'lct, A.P. ...Respondents/Defacto Compla-lnant Petition filed under section 482 of cr.p.c praying that I-n the circumstances stated I'n the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal PetI-lion, the High Court may be pleased to Quash the proceedings in FIR No.5 of 2020 of Thottambedu police Station, Tiruaptl-Urban DI'StriCt. + ' I'A. NO: 1 OF2020 q _`"` `` petition filed under sectI-On 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated I-n the Memorandum of crI'mI'nal PetI'tiOn, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings I'nCluding arrest of the Petitioners in connection Wl'th the Crl-me in FIR No.5 of 2020 of Thottambedu Police StatI'On, Tirupati urban` District. Counsel for the petl-tioners.-sri R.Chandra Reddy Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : Sri Madhu Suclhan P counsel for the Respondent No.2:Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, Assistant public Prosecuto.r The Court made the following: AP HCOI O254292O20 'N THE HIGH CAPTUR;TMAPEAAvNADTTRA PRADESH [3396l (special original JuriSd'lCt'lOn) THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY =sINDoA Y+H\OnuE*vinN D TWENTY FNE PRESENT THE tiONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAt PRATAPA EE]rirmHRIHd EEiiHi1"ERA RIm=L EEEEuZ]HEEL IWseeKn\ LYA N I ,_ vyl.P r?A c^H^A\\nDIRvAASR= KsHTARRE EJTE,TTs±R±&^=+#A5sTTI=oNINON BetWeen'. 3-874, JATTIPALEM, MANDIVARI STREET, SRIKALAHASTI TOWN AND MANDAL, G.S.T CENTRE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 2 SINGANAMALLU CHANDRASEKHAR JETTY, S/O S NARASAIAH, i tNEGA5No? M \RL_ILoU+ ^C#\l N%\8%LA4=MEJkA*TADTiPLAiLEG€ Sin ,l+ wiCAENND* # ,Rt HSI TTTR= EoTi SRIKALAHASTI TOWN AND MANDAL, G.S T CENTRE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT I ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1 P CHANDF\A MOHAN, S/O LATE P RAGHAVAIAH, RESIDING AT NP oC HA8\1D35R,A _SA&YHG^Ap*+TA±#nOMnARLADT%sEoTL=%cNKTY?-\±±i ieir LA HAS"OIN N , TIRUPATI URBAN, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, THROUGH SHO, THOTTAMBEDU P S , REP BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH €H%%uTRTT*whisiFE-DAuNPDHSiA R==A%t±+i rAuTDLrfuLRivATHl, GuNTuR D'STRICT I A-P I ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S)-I petltlon under sect`on 437/438/439/482 of CrP C and 528 of BNSS praylng that `n the c`rcumstances stated `n the Memorandum Of Grounds of crlmlnal Pet,t`On, the H`gh Court tO Quash the PrOCeedlngS `n FIR No 5 of 2020 of Thottambedu Pol`Ce Stat`On, T`ruaPt` Urban Dlst"I and Pass Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings including arrest of the petitioners in connection with the crime in FIR No. 5 of 2020 of Thottambedu Police Station, Tirupati Urban District and pass Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(s): 1. R CHANDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 2.MADHU SUDHAN P 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTH[RMAI PRATAPA RIMINAL PETITl NNO: ORDER: The instant Criminal Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal procedure, 1973 (for Short 'Cr.P.C)/under Section 528 of BNSS, has been flled by the petitioners/Accused Nos.1 & 2, seek,ng quaShment Of the proceedings pending against them in FIR No.5 of 2020 of Thottambedu Police station, Tirupati Urban, Chittoor District registered for the OffenCeS Pun'lShable under sections 406, 420 r/w 34 of IPC. 2. Heard Sri R.Chandra Reddy, learned COunSe[ for the pet'ltioners/Accused Nos. 1 & 2 and Ms. K. Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor On behalf Of the State. 3. Learned COunSel for the Petitioners WOuld Subm'lt that the Petition may be d'lsposed of, without causing any prejudice to the rights and contentions of the petitioners. 4. Learned Assistant Pub'-lc Prosecutor WOuld Submit that the Court may pass appropr'late orders. 5. Considering the SubmiSSiOnS made, the Criminal Pet'ltion iS disposed Of without caus'lng any prejudice to the rights and contentions of the petitioners and the police are directed to conclude the investigation and file a report before the concerned court according to I?w within a period of three (3) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order, if not already filed. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous peti{jons pending, I-i any, sha" stand closed. //TRUE COPY// Sd/-SHAIK MOHD. RAFI \SSISTANT/ REGISTRAR To, ASSISsT#: OFFICER 1. The Statl'on House officer, Thottambedu pol,-ce statl'on, Tirupat,-urban, Chittoor District. 2. One CC to Sri R.Chandra Reddy, Advocate [opuc] 3. One CC to Sri Madhu sudhan p, Advocate [opuc] 4. Two CCs {o the public prosecutor, High Court ofAP at AmaravatI [OUT] 5. Two CD Copies BSV (gsg) ? -I. .r.. . |'¢ A+ I . '`_`*b. c \ HIGH COURT DATED..17/07/2025 ORDER CRLP NO. 3959 OF 2020 DISPOSING OF THE CRIMINAL PETITION