HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10607 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Ms. Gursimrat Kaur, Advocate holding brief on behalf of Ms. Aprajita Bansal, learned counsel for the opposite parties no.2 to 5. 2. The present writ petition is misconceived as upon perusal of documents, we find that there are certain disputed questions of fact. 3. The petitioner has a remedy under Section 127 of Electricity Act, 2006. 4. Accordingly, we relegate the petitioner to avail the alternative remedy. In the event the petitioner files an appeal under Section 127 of Electricity Act, 2006 in accordance with law, the authorities are directed to grant an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and thereafter pass a reasoned order in accordance with law. 5. With the above direction, writ petition is disposed of. October 31, 2025 Ram. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Girijesh Kumar Chauhan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Aprajita Bansal (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Nawab .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Energy Vidyut Deptt. Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench