[2025:RJ-JP:33840] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6149/2025 Jagdish S/o Late Shri Ramniwas, Aged About 65 Years, R/o Village Dangarthal, Police Station Niwai, District Tonk Presently Residing At Maharishi Gautam Nagar, Beelwa, Tonk Road Jaipur, Police Station Shivdaspura, District Jaipur. (The Accused Petitioner Is In Judicial Custody In District Jail Tonk). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhijeet Panchariya For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP Mr. Ugra Sen Yadav, with Mr. P. Sharma, for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 26/08/2025 1. This second bail application has been filed under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 on behalf of accused-petitioner in connection with FIR No. 153/2024 registered at Police Station Niwai, District Tonk for offences under Sections 143, 323, 308, 452 & 504 of IPC. Later on charge-sheet was submitted for offences under Sections 143, 323, 308, 452, 504 & 302 of IPC. 2. Heard. 3. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused petitioner is in custody since 17.03.2024. He further submits that the co-accused Hanuman has already been enlarged on bail and the case of the accused petitioner is on better footings and there is no allegation against the present accused petitioner in [2025:RJ-JP:33840] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-6149/2025] the FIR so also in the statement of the complainant witness recorded during her examination before the trial Court. He further submits that the co-accused Hanuman has already been enlarged on bail vide order dated 27.01.2025. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor as well as the counsel for the complainant vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. Having regard to the submissions made by counsel for the accused petitioner and totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and more particularly the fact that co-accused Hanuman has already been enlarged on bail, and the Court, on scrutiny of the material made available on record, is of the opinion that the case of the present accused petitioner is not distinguishable from the case of the co-accused Hanuman, who has been already been enlarged on bail and thus to maintain the parity, the Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, this second bail application under Section 483 of the BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner named above in connection with the aforesaid FIR shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- together with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava /118