SATYENDRA KUMAR SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT., LKO. AND OTHERS
/1140/2025 · 2025-11-26
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183704 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183704 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - B No. - 1140 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard Sri Hari Narayan Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for respondent nos. 1 to 6. 2. In the light of proposed order notice to private respondent no. 7 is dispensed with. 3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that it is against orders passed under Section 166/167 of the U.P. Z.A. & L.R. Act that while the property which was purchased by the petitioner stood vested in the State Government. The petitioner being aggrieved by order vesting the property in the State, preferred an appeal before the Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Lucknow. It is during pendency of the said proceedings that respondent no. 7 had moved an application for transfer of the case to some other Court before the Board of Revenue. The Board of Revenue after hearing the petitioner by means of order dated 26.05.2025, had allowed the transfer application and rejected the objections filed by the petitioner. 4. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner preferred review of order dated 26.05.2025, which is pending consideration before the Board of Revenue and it is submitted that in the meanwhile, proceedings have been transferred to the Court of Commissioner, Lucknow Division, Lucknow and are likely to be concluded and accordingly, submits that the application for review would Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Hari Narayan Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dilip Kumar Pandey Satyendra Kumar Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt., Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s)
be rendered infructuous. 5. After arguing the matter up to some length, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that suitable directions may be passed to the Board of Revenue to decide Case No. REW 3043 of 2025, expeditiously. 6. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection in case suitable directions are issued to the Board of Revenue, U.P. Lucknow to consider and decide petitioners case with expedition. 7.
In view of above, present writ petition is disposed of with direction to Board of Revenue, U.P. Lucknow to proceed to consider and decide Case No. REW 3043 of 2025, expeditiously, say within six weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, in case there is no legal impediment. November 26, 2025 A. Verma WRIB No. 1140 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench