Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
APHC010254322020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3962/2020 Between:
1. CH.VENKATA RAO,, S/O. CH.VEERA VENKATA SATYANARAYANA, AGED 59 YEARS, OCC. EX. CEO, R/O. H.NO.5-12, PRATHIPADU, LAMPAKALOVA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH -
533430.
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND
1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , REP.BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT, AMARAVATHI.
2. SRI A RADHAKRISHNA RAO, , S/O. NOT KNOWN, AGED MAJOR, OCC DIVISIONAL COOPERATIVE OFFICER - PEDDAPURAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court pleased to quash the Cr.No.270/2020 of P.S. Prathipadu, East Godavari District, as against the Petitioner herein, and pass such other order or orders as may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
2
IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim stay of all further proceedings in Cr.No.270/2020 of P.S. Prathipadu, East Godavari District, pending disposal of the above criminal petition and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:
1. V SESHA KUMARI Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):
1. SPL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR FOR CID The Court made the following:
ORDER :
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that, without causing any prejudice to the rights and
contentions of the petitioner, the petition may be disposed of
2. Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor representing the respondent-State, would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders.
3. In that view, this Criminal Petition is disposed of without causing any prejudice to the rights and contentions of the petitioner. This Court makes it clear that this Court has not expressed anything touching the merits of the case. However, the petitioner is at liberty to raise his contentions before the
3
trial Court. The trial Court may appreciate and take appropriate decision according to law.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
_________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 28.07.2025 ARR
4
237 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3962/2020 Dt. 28.07.2025
ARR