MOHD ASLAM v. UNION TERRITORY OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR TH SECY RURAL DEPTT AND ANR
WP(C)/204/2020 · 2025-09-01
Vinod Chatterji Koul
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1837 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1837 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sr. No. 62 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 204/2020
Mohd Aslam …. Petitioner/Appellant(s)
Through:- None
V/s
Union Territory of J&K & Anr. …..Respondent(s)
Through:- None
CORAM :
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL, JUDGE
ORDER 01.09.2025
There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner today, as was the case on the previous date of hearing. Since the petitioner has chosen not to appear on the last date as well as today, it appears that he has lost interest in prosecuting the instant matter. The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Interim direction, if any shall stand vacated.
(VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL)
Judge JAMMU Amit 01.09.2025