CHANDRABHAN AND OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND OTHERS
CRLP/10547/2025 · 2025-12-01
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183693 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183693 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10547 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.G.A. for the respondents-authorities as well as Shri Vinod Kumar Tiwari, Advocate who files vakalatnama on behalf of respondent No.4.
2. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners states that he does not intend to press the instant petition and prays that the same may be dismissed as not pressed.
3. The writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. December 1, 2025 prateek Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Subhash Chandra Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Chandrabhan And Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRATEEK ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench