221 AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-55027-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 08.05.2025 Jitender Rana @ Jitender @ Jitu ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ Present: Mr. Ashit Malik, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. Tanuj Sharma, AAG, Haryana. *** RAJESH BHARDWAJ , J. (ORAL) CRM-43782-2024 Application for exemption is allowed as prayed for. Main case 1. Instant petition has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 seeking regular bail in case FIR No.698 dated 04.10.2023 under Sections 120B/148/149/302/324/34 (later on Section 506 IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959 were added) registered at Police Station Sadar Thanesar, District Kurukshetra. 2. After arguing at length, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he does not wish to press the present petition at this stage and the same may be dismissed as such. 3. However, it has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that despite having been given 12 opportunities to the prosecution they are not intentionally examining the prosecution witnesses. 4. The prosecution is directed to produce the prosecution witnesses positively and the trial Court concerned is also directed to examine the said witnesses on the date fixed. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands dismissed as not pressed at this stage. (RAJESH BHARDWAJ) 08.05.2025 JUDGE Parveen kumar Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable :Yes/No Parveen Kumar 2025.05.09 10:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document