Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 183671 (ALL)

THAKUR PRASAD @ MACHRILAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

/9564/2024 · 2025-11-19

Rajeev Bharti, Rajnish Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9564 of 2024 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. 1. On 16.12.2024, the following order was passed:- "1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. By means of this petition, the petitioner has sought quashing of First Information Report dated 12.11.2024 bearing F.I.R. No.0349 of 2024, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C. registered at Police Station Achalganj, District Unnao. 3. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. According to the petitioner, dispute between the parties are civil in nature as it relates to agreement to sell and the allegations made in the impugned F.I.R. are false and concocted, hence, he prays for protection. Learned counsel further submits that the co-accused Shiv Shankar and Ram Khelawan have already been granted protection by this Court in Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No.9426 of 2024 vide order dated 11.12.2024. 4. On due consideration, prima facie, a case for consideration is made out. 5. Issue notice to the opposite party no.4. Steps be taken within a week. 6. Office will submit service report on the basis of computerized tracking report. 7. Let counter affidavit be filed within four weeks. 8. Connect and list with Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No.9426 of 2024 after four weeks. 9. Considering the submissions made, it is provided that till the next date of listing, the petitioner shall not be arrested on the basis of the impugned First Information Report, unless sufficient and credible evidence is available against him. The petitioner shall, however, cooperate in the investigation and get his statement recorded before the Investigating Officer as and when he is called. If he does not do so then it can be made a ground for seeking vacation of this interim order." Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sudhir Kumar Rai, Devesh Bahadur Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Thakur Prasad @ Machrilal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) 2. Learned A.G.A. on the basis of instruction dated 22.1.2025 received from Senior Sub-inspector, police station Achalganj, District Unnao, which is taken on record, submits that the final report no. 05/2025 dated 21.1.2025 was forwarded in the matter, therefore, this petition has rendered infructuous. 4. Dismissed accordingly. November 19, 2025 Shravan CRLP No. 9564 of 2024 2 (Rajeev Bharti,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHRAVAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench