INDRESH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.
BAIL/10555/2025 · 2025-10-31
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183657 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183657 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10555 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 231 of 2025, under Sections 105 BNS, P.S. Kotwali Tanda, District Ambedkar Nagar. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that on the date of incident the brother of informant aged about 29 years was having a fight with applicant and both the person started hitting each other. Subsequently both of them suffered head injuries and was subsequently referred to medical college where he died. In the light of the said learned counsel for the applicant states that in the fight which has ensued the applicant had also suffered substantial head injuries however the applicant did not die. Injuries sustained by the applicant are contained in annexure 2. The cause of death of the deceased is also head injuries. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the fact that the injuries were attributed to fight in between the parties in which both of them suffered head injuries, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 27.7.2025 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Panna Lal Gupta, Amit Kumar, Ankur Gupta, Shiv Prasad Chaurasia, Tulsi Ram Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Indresh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
6. Let the applicant Indresh be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
October 31, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 10555 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench