APHC010255412010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: Between: Vangala Satyanarayana, Eluru State of A P Rep By Public Prosecutor High Court Hyd Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K SATYANARAYANA MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent: The Court made the following This Criminal Revision Case is filed aggrieved by the order dated 08.11.2010 passed in Crl.M.P.No. Sessions Judge, (Fast Track Court), West Godavari, El 2. Sri K.K.Raghuveer, learned Murthy, learned counsel for the petitioner, infructuous inasmuch as the revision was filed questioning the dismissal of the discharge petition. 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 2. NIMMAGADDA SATYANARAYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2329 OF 2010 Vangala Satyanarayana, Eluru ...PETITIONER AND A P Rep By Public Prosecutor High Court Hyd ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner: K SATYANARAYANA MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent: The Court made the following Order: This Criminal Revision Case is filed aggrieved by the order dated passed in Crl.M.P.No.33 of 2010, on the file of the V Additional Sessions Judge, (Fast Track Court), West Godavari, Eluru. , learned counsel, representing Sri K.Satyanarayana , learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the matter has infructuous inasmuch as the main case itself was ended in acquittal revision was filed questioning the dismissal of the discharge petition. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) NIMMAGADDA SATYANARAYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3521] THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENT This Criminal Revision Case is filed aggrieved by the order dated V Additional representing Sri K.Satyanarayana submits that the matter has become in acquittal. The revision was filed questioning the dismissal of the discharge petition. 3. Recording the above submission, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt: 10.3.2025 TJN 78 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2329 OF 2010 10.3.2025 TJN HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2329 OF 2010 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No. Date ORDER OFFICE NOTE 11. 10.3.2025 Dr. YLR, J The Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. (Vide separate order) __________ Dr. YLR, J TJN