Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 183633 (ALL)

MANOJ KUMAR SRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER

NABAIL/1983/2025 · 2025-12-11

Karunesh Singh Pawar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1983 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. Heard learned counsel for applicant as well as learned Additional Government Advocate for State. Present application for anticipatory bail has been filed for protection in regard to F.I.R. No. 181 of 2025 under Sections 316(5), 318(4), 336(3), 340(2) BNS, P.S.-Gosaiganj, District-Ayodhya/Faizabad. After arguing for some time, applicant's counsel submits that the present application for anticipatory bail may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file a regular bail application which may be decided in view of law laid by Supreme Court passed in Special Leave to Appeal (Cri) No.5191 of 2021 "Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another". Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer of learned counsel for the applicant. In view of the above, present anticipatory bail application is dismissed as not pressed. It is provided that in case a regular bail application is filed within ten days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, the same shall be decided in view of the law laid by by Supreme Court vide order dated 7.10.2021 passed in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra). December 11, 2025 Vinay/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Karunesh Singh, Vijay Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Manoj Kumar Srivastava .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench