Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 183627 (ALL)

MANOJ KUMAR PANDEY AND OTHERS v. CONSOLIDATION OFFICER, BALRAMPUR AND OTHERS

A227/6900/2025 · 2025-11-25

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6900 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Sri Yogesh Kr. Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to respondents is hereby dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioners praying for direction to the State-respondents to consider and decide Case bearing N. 4446/51/19- 20, 251/2020 (restoration) U/S 9-A(2) of U.P. Consolidation of Holding Act (Patan and others Vs. Mohd. Raza), expeditiously. 4. It is urged that though the matter is being listed but for one reason or the other, the aforesaid case is not being decided. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 6. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1-Consolidation Officer, Balrampur is directed to decide Case bearing N. 4446/51/19-20, 251/2020 (restoration) U/S 9-A(2) of U.P. Consolidation of Holding Act (Patan and others Vs. Mohd. Raza), expeditiously, say within a period of four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Yogesh Singh, Vipul Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Manoj Kumar Pandey And Others .....Petitioner(s) Consolidation Officer, Balrampur And Others .....Respondent(s) if there is no legal impediment. 8. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 9. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. November 25, 2025 Ravi/ A227 No. 6900 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench