HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11784 of 2025 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as also the learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The applicant has filed this application seeking bail in Case Crime No. 09 of 2025 under Section 3(1), U.P. Gangsters an Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, P.S. Paraspur, District Gonda. 3. The gang chart mentions involvement of the applicant in three cases, in all of which he has been granted bail. 4. In the affidavit filed in support of bail application it has been stated that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. It has also been stated in the affidavit filed in support of the bail application that the applicant is neither a leader nor member of any gang. 5. The learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but he could not dispute the aforesaid aspects of the matter. 6. Prima facie it appears that the applicant has been implicated in the present case merely because he has a criminal history. There appears to be no reasonable ground for prima facie believing that the applicant is guilty of the offence alleged. 7. The minimum punishment which can be imposed in case of the applicant's conviction is imprisonment for two years. 8. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact that the applicant has been implicated in the present case merely because he has a criminal history; that there appears to be no reasonable ground for prima facie believing that the applicant is guilty of the offence alleged, and the co-accused has been granted bail, I am of the view that the applicant is also entitled to be granted bail on the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rajeev Kumar Mishra Rudra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ram Sevak .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) ground of parity. 9. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 10. Let the applicant- Ram Sevak be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his appearance is exempted by the learned trial court. December 1, 2025 A.Nigam BAIL No. 11784 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench