SHAILESH NATH PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN.SECY. HIGHER EDUCATION AND ORS.
WRIA/975/2020 · 2025-12-09
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183607 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183607 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 975 of 2020 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. December 9, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, Jagdish Prasad Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Deo Prakash Srivastava, Ram Raj (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Shailesh Nath Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy. Higher Education And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench