HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10413 of 2017 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Mr. Pawan Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the present petition has become infructuous as the same has lost its efficacy. 2. In view of aforesaid statement given by counsel for the petitioners, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. 3. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 4. Consigned to the records. December 3, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sharad Pathak, Pawan Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ajay Pratap Singh, Neeraj Chaurasiya (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) C/M Amar Gandhi Pustakalaya Balika Inter College And Anr. .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Secondary Edu.Civil Sectt.Andors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench