UMA SHANKER PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN.SECY.DEPTT.OF COOPERATIVE and OTHERS
WRIA/20205/2017 · 2025-11-27
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183602 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183602 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 20205 of 2017 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. November 27, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prem Shankar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Abdul Razzaque Khan (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Uma Shanker Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Deptt.Of Cooperative And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench