HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10839 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has duly explained his criminal antecedent relating to a single case. The alleged offence is triable by a Magistrate. The applicant is not named in the FIR and was not apprehended from the spot. His name has surfaced only in the confessional statements of the co-accused persons. No recovery has been made from his possession. The applicant is languishing in jail since 19.09.2025, and the charge sheet has already been filed. It is further submitted that there is no possibility of the applicant of fleeing away after being released from jail or tampering with the witnesses. In case the applicant is enlarged on bail, he shall not misuse the liberty of bail. Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts as argued by the learned counsel for the applicant. Considering the facts that the charge sheet has been filed, the offence is triable by a Magistrate, the applicant’s name has surfaced only in the confessional statements of the co-accused, and he is in custody since 19.09.2025, I find it to be a fit case for granting bail to the applicant. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pravin Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Salman .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) Let the applicant Salman involved in Case Crime No.- 393 of 2025, U/S- 3/5/8 of Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, Police Station- Bhadokhar, District- Raebareli, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions which are being imposed in the interest of justice:- (i) The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial. (ii) The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness. (iii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (iv) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (v) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him in accordance with law. (vi) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. (now Section 84 BNSS) is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law under Section 174-A IPC (now Section 209 of BNS). It is clarified that the observations made in this order are confined to the present bail application and shall have no bearing on the merits of the trial. November 11, 2025 R.C. BAIL No. 10839 of 2025 2 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM CHANDER YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench